This Static Spot is open for sponsor

Click Here to Sponsor MCT Eric Post in Full Page

Afrikaans Afrikaans Albanian Albanian Amharic Amharic Arabic Arabic Armenian Armenian Azerbaijani Azerbaijani Basque Basque Belarusian Belarusian Bengali Bengali Bosnian Bosnian Bulgarian Bulgarian Catalan Catalan Cebuano Cebuano Chichewa Chichewa Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional) Corsican Corsican Croatian Croatian Czech Czech Danish Danish Dutch Dutch English English Esperanto Esperanto Estonian Estonian Filipino Filipino Finnish Finnish French French Frisian Frisian Galician Galician Georgian Georgian German German Greek Greek Gujarati Gujarati Haitian Creole Haitian Creole Hausa Hausa Hawaiian Hawaiian Hebrew Hebrew Hindi Hindi Hmong Hmong Hungarian Hungarian Icelandic Icelandic Igbo Igbo Indonesian Indonesian Irish Irish Italian Italian Japanese Japanese Javanese Javanese Kannada Kannada Kazakh Kazakh Khmer Khmer Korean Korean Kurdish (Kurmanji) Kurdish (Kurmanji) Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Lao Lao Latin Latin Latvian Latvian Lithuanian Lithuanian Luxembourgish Luxembourgish Macedonian Macedonian Malagasy Malagasy Malay Malay Malayalam Malayalam Maltese Maltese Maori Maori Marathi Marathi Mongolian Mongolian Myanmar (Burmese) Myanmar (Burmese) Nepali Nepali Norwegian Norwegian Pashto Pashto Persian Persian Polish Polish Portuguese Portuguese Punjabi Punjabi Romanian Romanian Russian Russian Samoan Samoan Scottish Gaelic Scottish Gaelic Serbian Serbian Sesotho Sesotho Shona Shona Sindhi Sindhi Sinhala Sinhala Slovak Slovak Slovenian Slovenian Somali Somali Spanish Spanish Sundanese Sundanese Swahili Swahili Swedish Swedish Tajik Tajik Tamil Tamil Telugu Telugu Thai Thai Turkish Turkish Ukrainian Ukrainian Urdu Urdu Uzbek Uzbek Vietnamese Vietnamese Welsh Welsh Xhosa Xhosa Yiddish Yiddish Yoruba Yoruba Zulu Zulu

 

 

Article Navigation

Back To Main Page


 

Click Here for more articles

Google
Commercial or Informational? - Your Choice
by: Mikki Barry
An issue has been brewing almost since the inception of Google AdWords, regarding who "owns" what rights to which words. Trademark holders and business owners alike have been calling "foul" when a competitor uses their name, product name, or trademarked slogan in order to cause their advertisements to appear either in the Google search results (by use of meta tags or otherwise using the keywords in their website itself), or by purchasing those words via Google's AdWords which would then cause their ads to appear in the sponsored sections of the search pages.

In this particular case, Office Depot has sued Staples, claiming that Staples linked to words that are Office Depot trademarks, causing Staples ads to come up on searches for "Viking," which is a subsidiary of Office Depot. Office Depot claims trademark infringement, false advertising, unfair competition, and deceptive trade practices.

So what's going on here? Does a trademark mean that you then "own" that word or that phrase, and nobody else can use it ever? Can the "trademark police" stop you from using the words "Office Depot" unless you're talking about them specifically, including disallowing anyone from saying they are a store "like Office Depot?"

Trademark Infringement

Let's take a look at the claims that Office Depot are making against Staples. First in line is trademark infringement. Trademark law is carved out of our general ability to use words in any way we choose (in the US anyway) in order to protect consumers against inferior products, by clarifying the source of a product or service so that you can be certain that an "Office Depot Product" was actually made by Office Depot and not by someone else. It is relatively clear in this case that a consumer would not be confused in the least by clicking on an advertisement for a shop that does not claim to be Office Depot, or have Office Depot in their domain name. If I were the judge, I'd throw that one out on its nose.

False Advertising

How about false advertising? Well, since Staples isn't claiming to be anything but Staples, how could they be advertising falsely? The advertisement they have created is purportedly true. The only difference is that the mechanism by which the ads are shown. Is this false advertising? Not in my opinion anyway. It could, in fact, be argued that use of competitor's words in search engines are pro-consumer in that it provides the consumer with far more choices then they would otherwise find.

Unfair Competition

Unfair competition? Now that one is a possibility. Unfair competition laws are set to protect companies against other companies, rather than protect the consumer against companies, as trademark law and false advertising are set up to do. Unfair competition actions grew out of trademark infringement law to prevent one trader from diverting patronage from a rival by falsely representing that his goods were the goods of his rival. But wait a minute here; Staples wasn't passing off their goods by saying they were actually Office Depot's goods. Again, there was no likelihood of confusion or misunderstand as to the source of the product. So that one doesn't work terribly well either.

Deceptive Trade Practices

That leaves us with deceptive trade practices. So what ARE deceptive trade practices? The Federal Trade Commission defines prohibited activities in the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act as:

1) Passing off goods or services as those of another. Well, that looks a lot like unfair competition and trademark infringement.

2) Causes likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding as to the source or approval of goods or services; or an affiliation with or certification by someone else. Does a listing on a search engine imply an approval, affiliation or certification? Not to any consumer who has used a search engine for more than 15 minutes :-). Doesn't seem like this one fits either.

3) Uses deceptive representations or designations of the geographic source of the goods or service. Nope, don't see any of that here.

4) Represents that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses or benefits that they don't have, or that a person has some sponsorship, approval or connections that he or she does not. Office Depot hasn't claimed anything about the goods themselves, just that they are being advertised by purchasing words from AdWords that correspond to Office Depot protected words. So that doesn't work either.

5) Represents that the goods are original or new when they are not. See #4.

6) Represents that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality or grade, or of a particular style or model, when they are not. See #5

7) Disparages the goods, services or business of someone else by false or misleading representations. If you believe that simply displaying someone else's goods disparage yours, perhaps this one will fly, but likely not.

So what is the real point here?

So if such a cursory view by another attorney shows the large holes in the claims of this lawsuit, why file it? What is the point?

It is highly possible that Office Depot has filed this suit in order to bring attention to the practice of competitors ensuring that their advertisements are shown along with their competitors' in hopes that Congress takes up the issue and passes new laws or modifies current laws to prohibit the practice. However, prohibiting the use of competitor's words, products or phrases in meta tags or programs like AdWords would likely create much more difficulty than it solves. As a consumer, one uses a search engine in order to find the best product, the best price, or information on that or similar products to fulfill your current needs. It is in the best interest of the consumer to provide as much information as possible so that the consumer would be able to make the best choice for that particular consumer's circumstances.

The question comes down to a familiar one - should the Internet be primarily an outlet for information, or for commercialization? If you choose information, then anyone should be able to use whatever meta tags, adwords, keywords, or text that they desire, so long as they are not in violation of laws that protect consumers from poor quality, or confusion as to the source of a product or service. This would leave the constitutional right to "bash" particular products, use parody, satire, or simply mention products on your website and then sell AdWords to further promote your blog or whatever else you wish to promote. On the other hand, if you choose commercialization, use of trademarks in meta tags, on your website, or in AdWords would be prohibited, necessarily limiting the amount of easily accessible information on ANY subject, not just regarding products or e-commerce interests.

About the author:
Mikki Barry has been a trademark and intellectual property attorney for technology and small business companies since 1991. For more information see www.mikkibarry.comThis article is not meant to be legal advice.


Circulated by Article Emporium

 



©2005 - All Rights Reserved

This Static Spot is open for sponsor

All About Claims

Read Articles:


 Quadriplegia: Victims Seeking Legal Help

 Personal Injury Lawyers at your service

 Personal Injury Solicitation Specialists

 Your Social Security Approval Package (Finally,...

 DIVORCE - CONTESTED OR UNCONTESTED

 Statutory Dismissal and Disciplinary Procedures...

 Where to Get Legal Representation for Your Inju...

 OSDL RELEASES Q&A ADDRESSING RECENT LEGAL ACTIO...

 Google’s Book Scanning and Copyright Laws

 An Accident Compensation Claim Can Be Settled I...

 How To Avoid Injury Compensation Claim Dilemmas

 Commercial or Informational? - Your Choice

 Is it necessary to go to court?

 How to Make a Better SSI Case

 Mesothelioma Compensation–Claims And Counter-Cl...

 Personal Injury Compensation - The Edge

 Personal Injury Specialist - A Priceless Asset!

 Should you hire an accident attorney

 Doctors can help you in your SSI case

 Trademark Infringement

 Is Personal Injury A Need Or A Joke!

 Lumbar Pain and the System for the disabled

 HOW TO PROTECT REQUESTED CONFIDENTIAL SOCIAL SE...

 Mesothelioma Lawyers Helping The Mesothelioma V...

 9 Pros And Cons Of A Compensation Claim

 How To Deal With A Whiplash Injury

 Facts About FACTA, Or What Does FACTA Mean To Y...

 Where’s an Attorney When You Need One?

More Article Pages 1 - 2

 

Insurance Claims
 by: Alan Jason Smith

When you are involved in an accident insurance claims may not be the first thoughts on your mind. However, there are some procedures you should follow in order to preserve your right to file an insurance claim. This may be anything from hail damage to a stolen vehicle and does not refer solely to car accidents.

The first thing you want to do is prevention. Most insurance claims can be prevented even before the incident occurs. For instance, to prevent auto accident’s be cautious and think about taking a defensive driving course. To prevent stolen vehicle insurance claims, keep you vehicle locked up and parked in a secure place. To prevent damage from the forces of nature do not travel in bad weather and keep your car in a covered parkway. There are many ways to prevent yourself from incurring loss. Most ideas are just common sense. However, for more information contact your insurance agent for ideas on prevention. Next, you will want to remain calm. When disaster strikes people react. That is our nature. However, sometimes people’s reactions can make things worse on their insurance claims.

If you’re in a car accident this might mean taking the blame, leaving the scene of an accident, or putting your self in danger. If you’re car is stolen you may act on your reaction by accusing innocent persons. There are a number of problems that can arise when people over react that is why it is essential to your insurance claim for you to remain calm.

Now, the next thing you need to be aware of is time. You see, time is not on your side when filing an insurance claim. The longer you wait the less your chances are of recovering your loss. Most insurance companies will not even consider a claim if it was turned in a certain amount of time after the incident. It is also harder to prove the longer you go before submitting an insurance claim.

Finally, you will want to follow procedures and document everything. Insurance companies are hit with frauds all the time. In order to weed out the actual claims from the fraudulent ones, they have to have clear cut procedures. Unfortunately, this can sometimes be confusing to actual victims. Yet, they are in place out of the need to protect the company. This means that you will have to educate yourself to what the policies are. Find out what documentation you need and what forms you will have to file. If you need help, contact your insurance agent. That is what they are there for. If you follow this advice, you should be able to file a claim relatively easy and with the least amount of lag time before payment.



©2005 - All Rights Reserved

JV Blogs Visit free hit counter